| SDA assessment 
 OCR AS LEVEL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
 UNIT 2519: PRODUCT STUDY (Analysis and Development) The overall aim of the assessment criteria is to enable students
											    to show an understanding that there are issues of sustainability
											    in all designing and making activities. They should show this
											    throughout the different elements of their design folder. Teachers can use the criteria for continuous assessment of students’ work.
											    They also provide a checklist for students. However, it must be
											    remembered that sustainability issues are only ONE part of exam
											    board criteria and that those criteria offer students far more
											    opportunity for scoring marks. In order to receive an SDA Part 1 the student must show evidence
											    of having met the compulsory criteria (in bold) as well as two
											    of the other criteria. A.	Product Analysis and Design 1.	Analysis of chosen product• Shows evidence of thinking about
											    at least one moral issue inherent
											    in the design and use of the product (e.g. asks whether the product
											    meets a genuine need, asks
											    whether its production involves
											    any toxic emissions, asks whether the production of the product
				    supports fair trade).
 • Shows evidence of how the product may have at least one
											    environmental impact at any stage of its life cycle. (e.g. indicates
											    that a coffee maker heat plate uses unnecessary energy or that
											    difficulties of disassembly create problems for disposal). • Shows evidence of having considered at least one social
											    repercussion of the product’s design and use (e.g. indicates
											    whether or not the product promotes conviviality or individual
											    isolation). 2.	Initial design of Improved Product• Shows evidence of analysing the
											    product having used a simple
											    sustainability design process (e.g. has used a sustainability
				    abacus for at least one element of sustainability).
 • Indicates that the re-design can improve the
											      sustainability of the design in at least two different ways
											      (e.g. shows that
											    the re-design will use less energy,
										      recycled materials).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Justifies at least one aspect of the re-design on a sustainability
											    basis (e.g. decides to take forward at least one way of improving
											    the sustainability of the product when modelling and testing). B. Product Development, Modelling
											      and Testing
 • Shows an understanding that sustainability issues
											      may be a constraint on the design proposal (e.g. shows why renewable
											    energy sources are not available
											      and non-renewable sources have
											    to be used). • Makes an experimental model that tests the re-design
											    in at least one area of sustainability (e.g. tests whether or
											    not recycled plastic can be as strong as new plastic in the product). • Completes an evaluation showing how the re-designed
											      model is an improvement on the initial design in at least one
											      area of
											    sustainability (e.g. shows how
											      the re-designed model has less of an environmental impact than
										      the original).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Shows how the re-designed model could be improved further
											    to make it even more sustainable. (e.g. indicates that because
											    of available energy sources, only non-renewable energy is currently
											    used in manufacture, but shows understanding that use of wind
											    or solar generated energy will be an improvement).
 
 |